From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Handshoe v. Equitable Life Assur. Society of U.S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 29, 1935
163 Misc. 315 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)

Summary

In Handshoe v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc., 1935, 297 N.Y.S. 434, 435, the Supreme Court Appellate Term, First Department, reversed a lower court decision in favor of the agent.

Summary of this case from Burch v. Prudential Ins. Co.

Opinion

March 29, 1935.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Alexander Green, for the appellant.

Hyman J. Goldberg, for the respondent.



Under the terms of the agency contract the plaintiff's assignor was not entitled to commissions on premiums waived by the company pursuant to the policy during the period of disability.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur. Present — LYDON, FRANKENTHALER and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

Handshoe v. Equitable Life Assur. Society of U.S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 29, 1935
163 Misc. 315 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)

In Handshoe v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc., 1935, 297 N.Y.S. 434, 435, the Supreme Court Appellate Term, First Department, reversed a lower court decision in favor of the agent.

Summary of this case from Burch v. Prudential Ins. Co.
Case details for

Handshoe v. Equitable Life Assur. Society of U.S.

Case Details

Full title:PAULINE HANDSHOE, Respondent, v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Mar 29, 1935

Citations

163 Misc. 315 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)
297 N.Y.S. 434

Citing Cases

Burch v. Prudential Ins. Co.

We have been referred to a few cases in other states where the question has arisen. In Handshoe v. Equitable…