From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Handlin v. Pierson

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Apr 28, 2009
No. C08-1861-JCC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 28, 2009)

Opinion

No. C08-1861-JCC.

April 28, 2009


ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT


This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Brian Handlin Karen Handlin's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 23). No responses in opposition have been timely filed. The Court has carefully considered the motion and the balance of the record in this case, and hereby finds and rules as follows.

Plaintiffs seek to add five additional parties as defendants: Mark Merceri, James Aylesworth, Sean "Casey" Jones, Mortgageclose.com, Inc., and Ranier Title, LLC. The Federal Rules provide that, as here, after a party has been served with a responsive pleading, the party "may amend its pleading only with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave. The court should freely give leave when justice so requires." FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(2). The Court finds that the interests of justice require that the Plaintiffs be granted leave to file their Second Amended Complaint. The Court also finds that permitting leave to amend will result in no apparent prejudice to any person or entity.

Plaintiff's brief interchangeably names ReconTrust, LLC and Ranier Title, LLC, as the fifth party Plaintiffs seek to join. ( See Mot. 4, 6, 7 (Dkt. No. 23).) However, the proposed amended complaint names Ranier Title, LLC, and not ReconTrust, LLC. (Dkt. No. 23-2.) Plaintiffs named ReconTrust, LLC, in the First Amended Complaint ( see Dkt. No. 1 at 5), and on April 16, 2009, voluntarily dismissed that party from the action. (Dkt. No. 24.) As such, the Court believes that Plaintiffs' inclusion of ReconTrust, LLC, in its motion to amend was inadvertent. The Court therefore does not authorize the joining of that party in granting the motion.

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the Plaintiffs are hereby granted leave to file their Second Amended Complaint, which shall be filed no later than seven judicial days from the entry of this Order. This Order is entered without costs to any party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Handlin v. Pierson

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Apr 28, 2009
No. C08-1861-JCC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 28, 2009)
Case details for

Handlin v. Pierson

Case Details

Full title:KAREN HANDLIN, BRIAN HANDLIN, and MAXINE FORTUNE, Plaintiffs, v. MURPHY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Apr 28, 2009

Citations

No. C08-1861-JCC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 28, 2009)