From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Handlin, Mataxes v. Burkhart

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1985
487 N.E.2d 279 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Decided October 15, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, M. Hallsted Christ, J.

John Jaye Markos for appellant.

William M. Pinzler for respondents.



On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order dated May 21, 1984, insofar as it dismissed the complaint as to plaintiff Mataxes, affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 101 A.D.2d 850).

Appeal from the order dated August 22, 1984 dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE.


Summaries of

Handlin, Mataxes v. Burkhart

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1985
487 N.E.2d 279 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Handlin, Mataxes v. Burkhart

Case Details

Full title:WALTER HANDLIN et al., Plaintiffs, and PETER MATAXES, Appellant, v. V…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 15, 1985

Citations

487 N.E.2d 279 (N.Y. 1985)
487 N.E.2d 279
496 N.Y.S.2d 422

Citing Cases

Matter of Kantor v. Pavelchak

Here, the plaintiff concedes that the alleged defamatory statements were protected by this privilege as they…

Mandelblatt v. Perelman

This is one of a growing number of suits seeking to redress adverse employment action on a theory of…