From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Handadi v. Bhat

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Oct 11, 2012
NO. 01-12-00729-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 11, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 01-12-00729-CV

10-11-2012

RAVI PRAKASH HANDADI, Appellant v. MAMTHA RAVI BHAT, Appellee


On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 09DCV174996


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ravi Prakash Handadi, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (West Supp. 2012), § 51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees.

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown.


Summaries of

Handadi v. Bhat

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Oct 11, 2012
NO. 01-12-00729-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Handadi v. Bhat

Case Details

Full title:RAVI PRAKASH HANDADI, Appellant v. MAMTHA RAVI BHAT, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Oct 11, 2012

Citations

NO. 01-12-00729-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 11, 2012)