From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hand v. Pederson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 31, 2001
17 F. App'x 717 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


17 Fed.Appx. 717 (9th Cir. 2001) Douglas P. HAND; Pak Trak Industries, Inc.; Scott-Douglas Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Carl M. PEDERSON; Roger McPeak; Betty McPeak, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-36140. D.C. No. CV-98-9-JKS. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 31, 2001

Submitted August 10, 2001.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, James K. Singleton, Chief District Judge, Presiding.

Before SCHROEDER, T.G. NELSON, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The court has reviewed appellants' briefs and has determined that no factual or legal basis for reversing the district court has been shown. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hand v. Pederson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 31, 2001
17 F. App'x 717 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Hand v. Pederson

Case Details

Full title:Douglas P. HAND; Pak Trak Industries, Inc.; Scott-Douglas Industries…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 31, 2001

Citations

17 F. App'x 717 (9th Cir. 2001)