Hancock v. State

Full title: DANIELLE L. HANCOCK, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Aug 29, 2019

279 So. 3d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Nos. 1D17-4151 1D17-4153 (consolidated for disposition)

08-29-2019

Danielle L. HANCOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Office of Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Anne C. Conley and Damaris E, Reynolds, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Office of Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Anne C. Conley and Damaris E, Reynolds, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

We find the trial court did not err in making its competency determination; it did, however, neglect to put its oral ruling in writing. We, therefore, affirm but remand for entry of a written order. McCray v. State , 265 So. 3d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

Wolf, B.L. Thomas, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.