From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hancock v. Hood

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Feb 18, 2010
CIVIL ACTION 2:09-00026-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Feb. 18, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 2:09-00026-KD-N.

February 18, 2010


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.2(c)(1), and dated January 25, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court with the exception of footnote seven which is STRICKEN.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that

(1) the motion to dismiss filed by Dr. Brian S. Claytor (doc. 34) is GRANTED as follows: All claims asserted against Dr. Claytor are DISMISSED with prejudice except the claim under the Alabama Medical Liabilities Act, Ala. Code § 6-5-484 (1975) asserted against Dr. Claytor in Count Five of the Third Amended Complaint, which is DISMISSED without prejudice;
(2) the alternative motion to transfer filed by Dr. Claytor (doc. 34) is DENIED;
(3) the motion to dismiss filed by Perry County Sheriff James Hood (doc. 39) is GRANTED and the claims asserted against Sheriff Hood are DISMISSED with prejudice; and
(4) the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Tommy Buford (doc. 60) is GRANTED and the claims asserted against Tommy Buford are DISMISSED with prejudice.

Thus, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED in its entirety.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hancock v. Hood

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Feb 18, 2010
CIVIL ACTION 2:09-00026-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Feb. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Hancock v. Hood

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HANCOCK, Plaintiff, v. JAMES HOOD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Feb 18, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 2:09-00026-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Feb. 18, 2010)