From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hancock v. Benning

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
NO. 3-10-0935 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 3-10-0935

03-14-2013

DAVID HANCOCK, et al. v. THOMAS R. BENNING, M.D., et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court, among other things, are the following Motions:

Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 1 Re Liability Insurance (Docket No. 36) is GRANTED as unopposed and pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 411.

Plaintiffs' Motion for Voir Dire by Counsel (Docket No. 49) is GRANTED as unopposed. This is the Court's usual practice.

Plaintiffs' Motion to Limit Defendants' Expert Witnesses (Docket No. 50) is GRANTED as unopposed. Local Rule 39.01(c)(6)(a).

Plaintiffs' Motion to Limit Defendants' Pre-Emptory Strikes (Docket No. 51) is GRANTED as unopposed and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 47(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1870.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hancock v. Benning

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
NO. 3-10-0935 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Hancock v. Benning

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HANCOCK, et al. v. THOMAS R. BENNING, M.D., et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

NO. 3-10-0935 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2013)