Opinion
22381
December 24, 2001.
APPEAL FROM THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 90-316K)
Richard Naiwieha Wurdeman, for the heirs of Frank Piulu Kahapea, on their motion Stephen K. Yamashiro, for the Hanakeawes (heirs of Kalei Kahapea), on their motion
MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, RAMIL, JJ., and CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE G. CHANG, ASSIGNED BY REASON OF VACANCY
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION
The motion for reconsideration filed on November 5, 2001 by the the plaintiffs-appellants/appellees/cross-appellees the Estate of Marguerite Hanakeawe (aka Marguerite Hanakeawe Johnston), Dennis Kane Hanakeawe (aka Dennis Hanakeawe), Olivia Maile Medeiros Aquino, Joyce Lokelani Olga Medeiros Farias, Diana Kilani Hanakeawe Furtado, Richard Semona Gaudia, Ruben Hinano Gaudia, Olinda April Kalei Capiso Gaudia Kamakahi, Odella Piilani Gaudia Nakanelua, David Kalei Hanakeawe, Doris Kaulaaihawane Kamahele Hanakeawe, Denise Kaiulani Hanakeawe, Donna Kilohana Hanakeawe, Duane Kaipo Hanakeawe, Davery Kamanu Hanakeawe, Duenna Kuuipo Hanakeawe, Francine Lola Kamaile Escalona Pestana, and Doris Kalua Hanakeawe Preuss, who are lineal descendants of Kalei Kahapea, deceased, and the motion for reconsideration filed on November 8, 2001 by the crossclaim defendants-appellees/appellants/cross-appellees Dayton Arruda, Darmon Arruda, Douglas Arruda, Kathy K. Arruda, Jo Ann Arruda, Lance Arruda, Lanny Arruda, Marvin Kaleookalani Arruda, Roberta Kahapea Bee, Winona A. Bell, Robyn K.M.Y. Elliott, Laurie Ann Kalei Kalama, Marsha Heidi Estocado, the Estate of Maxine Estocado, Richard Estocado, Richard Lee Estocado, Melba Mae Evanoff, Thomas Kaelemakule, George P.K. Kahapea (aka Chester George P.K. Kahapea), Chester Frank P. Kahapea, Frank Kanui Poohiwi Kahapea, Joseph Nalua Kahapea (aka Nalua Joseph Kahapea), Lurline Kahapea, Robert J.K. Kahapea, Ronald K. Kahapea, Sylvester K. Kahapea, Mauleen Law, Bernice J.K. Leialoha, Nadine Medeiros, Priscilla Reed Arruda, and Rochelle Walker, who are lineal descendants of Frank Piulu Kahapea, deceased, respectively requesting that this court review its summary disposition order, filed on October 10, 2001, are hereby denied.