From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamrick v. Perdue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 2008
57 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4830.

December 16, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered May 29, 2008, which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and an immediate trial of the issue of damages and granted defendants' cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Jonathan B. Altschuler, New York, for appellant.

Jackson Lewis LLP, Melville (Roger H. Briton of counsel), for Roland P. Perdue, III and Fifth Avenue Presbyterian Church, respondents.

Montfort, Healy, McGuire Salley, Garden City (Donald S. Neumann, Jr. of counsel), for The Presbytery of New York City, respondent.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.


In this defamation action, defendants met their burden of showing that defendant Perdue's statements that plaintiff misrepresented his academic credentials in connection with his employment by defendant Presbytery were true ( see Silverman v Clark, 35 AD3d 1, 12). Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue as to the falsity of the statements ( see id. at 13).

Perdue's statement to church staff and choir members that the "resulting lack of credibility and trust toward [plaintiff] caused by this matter has rippled through [the church and choir staff] and beyond" was made in the context of explaining why plaintiff had been terminated and was an expression of opinion, not fact ( see Mann v Abel, 10 NY3d 271, 276; Galasso v Saltzman, 42 AD3d 310, 311).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining argument and find it unavailing.


Summaries of

Hamrick v. Perdue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 2008
57 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Hamrick v. Perdue

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH HAMRICK, Appellant, v. ROLAND P. PERDUE, III, et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 16, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9835
868 N.Y.S.2d 668

Citing Cases

KAPLAN v. KHAN

The common interest privilege has been applied to allegedly defamatory statements made in religious contexts,…