From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hampton v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 10, 1913
161 S.W. 965 (Tex. Crim. App. 1913)

Opinion

No. 2840.

Decided December 10, 1913.

Aggravated Assault — Statement of Facts.

Where the statement of facts was filed more than twenty days after adjournment of the County Court, it can not be considered on appeal.

Appeal from the County Court of Fort Bend. Tried below before the Hon. W.I. McFarlane.

Appeal from a conviction of aggravated assault; penalty, a fine of $100 and thirty days confinement in the county jail.

The opinion states the case.

No brief on file for appellant.

C.E. Lane, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.


This conviction was for aggravated assault upon an officer.

The court adjourned on 16th day of August; the statement of facts was filed on 15th day of September. This being a case tried in the County Court, the statement of facts to be considered ought to have been filed within twenty days from the adjournment of court. As the statement of facts was filed more than twenty days after adjournment of court, it can not be considered under the decisions. The motion for new trial is based on the alleged insufficiency of the evidence. In the absence of the statement of facts this ground of the motion for new trial can not be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hampton v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 10, 1913
161 S.W. 965 (Tex. Crim. App. 1913)
Case details for

Hampton v. the State

Case Details

Full title:TOM HAMPTON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 10, 1913

Citations

161 S.W. 965 (Tex. Crim. App. 1913)
72 Tex. Crim. 189

Citing Cases

Whitehead v. the State

The State makes a motion to strike them out on that account, which is granted. Durham v. State, 69 Tex.Crim.…

Schapiro v. the State

The State's motion to strike out and not consider them must, therefore, be sustained. Durham v. State, 69…