From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hampton v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland
Feb 8, 2007
No. 11-06-00275-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2007)

Opinion

No. 11-06-00275-CR.

Opinion filed February 8, 2007. Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 114th District Court Smith County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 114-0714-06.

Panel Consists of: WRIGHT, C.J., MCCALL, J., and STRANGE, J.


OPINION


This is an appeal from a judgment adjudicating guilt. Erica Hampton originally entered a plea of guilty to the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. A plea bargain agreement was not entered. The trial court deferred the adjudication of guilt and placed appellant on community supervision for eight years. At the hearing on the State's motion to adjudicate, appellant entered a plea of true. The trial court found that appellant had violated the terms and conditions of her community supervision, revoked her community supervision, adjudicated her guilt, and imposed a sentence of confinement for fifteen years and a $5,000 fine. We affirm.

Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and states that she has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of her right to review the record and file a response to counsel's brief. A response has not been filed. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969); Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex. App — Eastland 2005, no pet.).

Following the procedures outlined in Anders, we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit. We note that counsel has the responsibility to advise appellant that she may file a petition for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006). Likewise, this court advises appellant that she may file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 66.

The motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Hampton v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland
Feb 8, 2007
No. 11-06-00275-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Hampton v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERICA HAMPTON, Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland

Date published: Feb 8, 2007

Citations

No. 11-06-00275-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2007)