From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hampton v. Morales

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 16, 2024
2:23-cv-04296-SB-AJR (C.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-04296-SB-AJR

09-16-2024

GARY G. HAMPTON, JR., Plaintiff, v. J. MORALES, ET AL., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

HON. STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, the Court finds that there is no just reason to delay final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) and therefore:

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's claims against Captain Schumacher and Sergeant Ramsey are dismissed with prejudice. The Court notes that this judgment does not address Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against the Officer Defendants (Officers Morales, Ramirez, and Avalos).


Summaries of

Hampton v. Morales

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 16, 2024
2:23-cv-04296-SB-AJR (C.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Hampton v. Morales

Case Details

Full title:GARY G. HAMPTON, JR., Plaintiff, v. J. MORALES, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 16, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-04296-SB-AJR (C.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2024)