From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hampton v. Lee

United States District Court Southern District of New York
Oct 10, 2012
12 Civ. 02145 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2012)

Opinion

12 Civ. 02145 (JGK)

10-10-2012

Horace Hampton, Petitioner, v. William Lee, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:

The Court has received the petitioner's response to this Court's August 27, 2012 Order. The petitioner properly identifies that the pendency of a federal habeas corpus petition does not toll the one-year AEDPA statute of limitations, but that the pendency of properly filed state court postconviction proceedings does toll the statute of limitations. See Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167, 180-82 (2001).

However, the petitioner has clarified that he seeks a stay of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus during the pendency of his state court postconviction proceedings. AEDPA provides district courts discretion upon a showing of good cause to stay habeas corpus petitions that have raised both exhausted and unexhausted claims. Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 275-76 (2005); see 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). The petitioner has alleged facts that he argues demonstrate good cause to stay his petition.

The time for the respondents to respond is October 31, 2012. The time for petitioner to reply is November 14, 2012. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

October 10, 2012

______________________

John G. Koeltl

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hampton v. Lee

United States District Court Southern District of New York
Oct 10, 2012
12 Civ. 02145 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Hampton v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:Horace Hampton, Petitioner, v. William Lee, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court Southern District of New York

Date published: Oct 10, 2012

Citations

12 Civ. 02145 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2012)