From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hampton v. Fox

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 23, 2022
CV 19-5523-DDP (SP) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2022)

Opinion

CV 19-5523-DDP (SP)

09-23-2022

JAMES EARL HAMPTON, Petitioner, v. ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, Respondent


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAN D. PREGERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Vacate (docket no. 6) is granted, and Judgment will be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action without prejudice.


Summaries of

Hampton v. Fox

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 23, 2022
CV 19-5523-DDP (SP) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Hampton v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EARL HAMPTON, Petitioner, v. ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 23, 2022

Citations

CV 19-5523-DDP (SP) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2022)