From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hampshire v. Soto

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 7, 2016
577 U.S. 1202 (2016)

Opinion

No. 14–639.

03-07-2016

NEW HAMPSHIRE, petitioner, v. Michael SOTO, et al.


Motion of respondents Robert Dingman and Eduardo Lopez, Jr., for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire denied.


Summaries of

Hampshire v. Soto

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 7, 2016
577 U.S. 1202 (2016)
Case details for

Hampshire v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:NEW HAMPSHIRE, petitioner, v. Michael SOTO, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Mar 7, 2016

Citations

577 U.S. 1202 (2016)
577 U.S. 1202
194 L. Ed. 2d 376

Citing Cases

Willbanks v. Mo. Dep't of Corr.

Id.See, e.g., Ragland, 836 N.W.2d at 114; Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393, 394 (Fla. 2015) ; Aiken v. Byars,…