From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamood v. Stanowski

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 28, 2016
SC: 153910 (Mich. Dec. 28, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 153910

12-28-2016

AMEENA HAMOOD f/k/a AMEENA BEYDOUN and JOHN A. HAMOOD and RAMONA HAMOOD, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants-Appellants, and JAMAL JOHN HAMOOD and CHARLENE HAMOOD, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants, v. AL STANOWSKI and JENNY STANOWSKI, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs-Appellees.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 326089
Wayne CC: 99-911949-CH

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Hamood v. Stanowski

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 28, 2016
SC: 153910 (Mich. Dec. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Hamood v. Stanowski

Case Details

Full title:AMEENA HAMOOD f/k/a AMEENA BEYDOUN and JOHN A. HAMOOD and RAMONA HAMOOD…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Dec 28, 2016

Citations

SC: 153910 (Mich. Dec. 28, 2016)