From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammond v. Sheriff

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 24, 1975
532 P.2d 1030 (Nev. 1975)

Opinion

No. 8125

March 24, 1975

Appeal from Fifth Judicial District Court, Mineral County; Kenneth L. Mann, Judge.

Horace R. Goff, State Public Defender, and Gary D. Armentrout, Deputy, Carson City, for Appellant.

Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; Larry G. Bettis, District Attorney, Mineral County, for Respondent.


OPINION


This appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant prosecution of appellant for possession of marijuana. The only probative or demonstrable evidence of record, suggesting that contraband even existed in proximity to appellant, are three photographs a police officer took of a plant growing in a garden at the home of appellant's father, with whom appellant resides.

Deeming this evidence insufficient to hold appellant for trial, we reverse, with instructions to grant a writ of habeas corpus.


Summaries of

Hammond v. Sheriff

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 24, 1975
532 P.2d 1030 (Nev. 1975)
Case details for

Hammond v. Sheriff

Case Details

Full title:MIKE HAMMOND, APPELLANT, v. SHERIFF, MINERAL COUNTY, NEVADA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Mar 24, 1975

Citations

532 P.2d 1030 (Nev. 1975)
532 P.2d 1030

Citing Cases

Ursino v. Sheriff

In regard to count III the only probative or demonstrable evidence suggesting that cocaine even existed in…

Mills v. Sheriff

Accordingly, we reverse with instructions to grant the writ of habeas corpus. Cf. Hammond v. Sheriff, 91 Nev.…