From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammond v. Hammond

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 12, 2001
801 So. 2d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 1D01-1739

Opinion filed December 12, 2001.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Judge Jan Shackleford.

E. Jane Brehany, Pensacola, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Louis K. Rosenbloum of Louis K. Rosenbloum, P.A., Pensacola, and R. Brooks Davis of Myrick Davis, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.


The former husband appeals the trial court's order denying a request for modification of child support and visitation. We find no error in the denial of the petition for modification, and affirm as to that point. In denying the former wife's motion for attorney's fees, however, the trial court's order fails to make proper findings regarding whether each party has the ability to pay his or her own attorney's fees. Absent such a finding, the denial of fees is erroneous because of the apparent substantial disparity in the income of the parties. Hyatt v. Hyatt, 672 So.2d 74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court should make the proper findings regarding attorney's fees.

REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Hammond v. Hammond

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 12, 2001
801 So. 2d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Hammond v. Hammond

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS GRANT HAMMOND, JR., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. LANA DEANN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 12, 2001

Citations

801 So. 2d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Gaetani-Slade v. Slade

" "[A] trial court cannot decide the issue of attorney's fees without findings as to one spouse's ability to…