From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammond v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 26, 2013
(N.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2013)

Opinion

08-26-2013

VALERIE L. HAMMOND, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


THOMAS J. McAVOY,
Senior United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

This matter was referred to the Hon. Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. In a Report and Recommendation dated July 10, 2013 [dkt. # 15], Magistrate Judge Bianchini recommended that the Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be GRANTED and that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be DENIED. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been lodged and the time for filing objections has expired.

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report and Recommendation for the reasons stated therein.

Therefore, Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED. The Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Bianchini's recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Thomas J. McAvoy

Senior, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Hammond v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 26, 2013
(N.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Hammond v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:VALERIE L. HAMMOND, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 26, 2013

Citations

(N.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2013)

Citing Cases

Yargeau v. Berryhill

A claimant's testimony is acceptable evidence to support the inclusion of a limitation in an RFC…

Townsend v. Berryhill

In Carroll, the Court explained that it was not saying that "any moderate limitation in sitting or standing…