From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammond v. Berryhill

United States District Court Western District of North Carolina Charlotte Division
Mar 26, 2018
3:17-cv-00096-FDW (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2018)

Summary

holding no apparent conflict between a RFC that limits a plaintiff to "simple, work-related instructions and directions" and jobs that require General Education Development ("GED") Reasoning Level 2

Summary of this case from Bailey v. Saul

Opinion

3:17-cv-00096-FDW

03-26-2018

Tammy E. Hammond, Plaintiff(s), v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Defendant(s).


JUDGMENT IN CASE DECISION BY COURT. This action having come before the Court and a decision having been rendered; IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's March 26, 2018 Order.

March 26, 2018

/s/_________

Frank G. Johns, Clerk

United States District Court


Summaries of

Hammond v. Berryhill

United States District Court Western District of North Carolina Charlotte Division
Mar 26, 2018
3:17-cv-00096-FDW (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2018)

holding no apparent conflict between a RFC that limits a plaintiff to "simple, work-related instructions and directions" and jobs that require General Education Development ("GED") Reasoning Level 2

Summary of this case from Bailey v. Saul
Case details for

Hammond v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:Tammy E. Hammond, Plaintiff(s), v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Defendant(s).

Court:United States District Court Western District of North Carolina Charlotte Division

Date published: Mar 26, 2018

Citations

3:17-cv-00096-FDW (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2018)

Citing Cases

Scruggs v. Berryhill

This Court has consistently held there is no apparent conflict between a claimant's RFC limitation to simple,…

Everett v. Berryhill

Additionally, although it is well-known that ALJs must "show their work" and logically bridge the evidence to…