From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammler v. Dignity Health

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 16, 2021
1:20-cv-01778-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01778-HBK

06-16-2021

ALLEN HAMMLER, Plaintiff, v. DIGNITY HEALTH, et al. Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RULING AS PREMATURE

(Doc. No. 2)

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for ruling filed June 7, 2021. (Doc. No. 2). Plaintiff Allen Hammler, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 17, 2020. (Doc. No. 1). In the instant motion, Plaintiff request to proceed on his complaint. (See generally Doc. No. 2). Plaintiff, however, has neither filed a motion for leave to proceed as a pauper nor paid the requisite filing fee. (See docket).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff must either pay the requisite $402.00 filing fee or complete and file the attached motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order.

2. Plaintiffs motion for ruling (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED as premature.

3. Failure to timely comply with this order will result in the recommendation that this case be dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hammler v. Dignity Health

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 16, 2021
1:20-cv-01778-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Hammler v. Dignity Health

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN HAMMLER, Plaintiff, v. DIGNITY HEALTH, et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 16, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-01778-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2021)