From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammler v. Compose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2020
No. 1:19-cv-01149-DAD-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2020)

Opinion

No. 1:19-cv-01149-DAD-GSA (PC)

04-03-2020

ALLEN HAMMLER, Plaintiff, v. COMPOSE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE AND FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

(Doc. No. 16)

Plaintiff Allen Hammler is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 10, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) be denied because plaintiff had suffered three or more prior strike dismissals and that he be ordered to pay the required $400.00 filing fee to proceed with this action. (Doc. No. 5.) On December 18, 2019, the undersigned adopted those findings and recommendations, denied plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and ordered him to pay the required $400 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days. (Doc. No. 10.) Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to comply with that order and pay the required filing fee within the specified time would result in dismissal of this action. (Id. at 3.) Plaintiff has not paid the required filing fee or requested an extension of time to do so, and the deadline to pay the required filing fee has now passed.

On February 10, 2020, the magistrate judge issued the pending findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee and obey a court order. (Doc. No. 16.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days of service. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to those findings and recommendations, and the time in which to do so has now passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly,

1. The February 10, 2020 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 16) are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to obey a court order and to pay the required filing fee; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 3 , 2020

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hammler v. Compose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2020
No. 1:19-cv-01149-DAD-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2020)
Case details for

Hammler v. Compose

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN HAMMLER, Plaintiff, v. COMPOSE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 3, 2020

Citations

No. 1:19-cv-01149-DAD-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2020)