From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammers v. Hammers

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division
Apr 7, 1992
829 S.W.2d 636 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 60053.

April 7, 1992.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. FRANCOIS COUNTY, RAYMOND WEBER, J.

V. Kenneth Rohrer, Farmington, for plaintiff/appellant.

Dennis E. McIntosh, Farmington, for defendants/respondents.


In this bench-tried case, plaintiff sought a constructive trust on certificates of deposit given to three of her children. The trial court denied her relief.

Our scope of review is limited. The trial court's judgment is to be sustained on appeal unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, unless it is against the weight of the evidence, unless it erroneously declares the law, or unless it erroneously applies the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976).

Here, three witnesses' testimony constitutes substantial evidence to support the trial court's judgment. We have read the transcript and do not have "a firm belief that the . . . judgment is wrong." Id. Nor is the judgment against the weight of the evidence.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. the trial court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hammers v. Hammers

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division
Apr 7, 1992
829 S.W.2d 636 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Hammers v. Hammers

Case Details

Full title:MAMIE HAMMERS, PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. ROBERT HAMMERS, BONNIE THOMPSON…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 7, 1992

Citations

829 S.W.2d 636 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)