From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammer v. Ritchey

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 25, 2005
No. CA 4-1839 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 25, 2005)

Opinion

No. CA 4-1839.

October 25, 2005


ORDER


AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2005, the court has been advised by counsel for the parties that the above-captioned action has been settled and that the only matters remaining to be completed are the payment of the settlement proceeds and the submission of a stipulation for dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a). It appears that there is no further action required by the court at this time.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk mark the above-captioned case closed; that nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action, and that should further proceedings therein become necessary or desirable, either party may initiate the same in the same manner as if this order had not been entered.


Summaries of

Hammer v. Ritchey

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 25, 2005
No. CA 4-1839 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 25, 2005)
Case details for

Hammer v. Ritchey

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY HAMMER, Plaintiff, v. MARK V. RITCHEY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 25, 2005

Citations

No. CA 4-1839 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 25, 2005)