From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HAMMER v. DAHL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

December, 1934.


Appeal by defendants, appellants, from order striking out certain allegations of the complaint in so far as such order denied defendants' motion to strike out other parts of the complaint, dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Millard v. Delaware, Lackawanna Western R.R. Co. ( 204 App. Div. 80). If defendants have not served an answer to the second amended complaint, their time so to do is extended ten days from the service of a copy of the order to be entered, with notice of entry thereof. Motion No. 1474 to dismiss appeal granted. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

HAMMER v. DAHL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

HAMMER v. DAHL

Case Details

Full title:CHARLOTTE HAMMER, Respondent, v. GERHARD M. DAHL and Others, Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1934

Citations

243 App. Div. 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Kolber v. Kolber

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent, for the reason that the amended…

Gilchrest House v. Guaranteed Title and Mortgage

The amended complaint is not before the court. ( Kolber v. Kolber, 267 App. Div. 837; Millard v. Delaware,…