Hammer v. Cardio Medical Products, Inc.

Full title: NANCY HAMMER, Plaintiff, v. CARDIO MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 11, 2006

Civil Action No. 01-564 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 01-564.

January 11, 2006

ORDER

WILLIAM STANDISH, Senior District Judge

AND NOW, this 11^th day of January, 2006, after the plaintiff filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, and after a Report and Recommendation was issued by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the parties were granted ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the plaintiff, as well as the defendant's response to those objections, and after independent review of the pleadings, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute (Docket No. 92) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the F.R.App.P., if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order, she must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 F.R.App.P.