From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammack v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
May 7, 2002
75 S.W.3d 299 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

affirming denial

Summary of this case from Hammack v. State

Opinion

No. ED 79986

May 7, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Madison County, Honorable Kenneth W. Pratte.

Amy M. Bartholow, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Audara L. Charlton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before: George W. Draper III, P.J., Mary R. Russell, J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.



ORDER


Joseph Hammack ("Movant") appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was charged with first degree trafficking of methamphetamine in violation of section 195.222 RSMo 2000 and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of section 195.233. In addition, he was charged with possession of acetone with intent to process methamphetamine and possession of iodine with intent to process methamphetamine, both in violation of section 195.420. Movant entered anAlford plea to all four counts. We find no error and affirm.

All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise indicated.

See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31 (1970).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hammack v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
May 7, 2002
75 S.W.3d 299 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

affirming denial

Summary of this case from Hammack v. State
Case details for

Hammack v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH HAMMACK, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: May 7, 2002

Citations

75 S.W.3d 299 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Hammack v. State

An amended motion was filed and then denied without an evidentiary hearing. See Hammack v. State, 75 S.W.3d…