Hamm v. Rendell

Full title: ANCELL HAMM, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD RENDELL, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 11, 2007

Civil Action No. 03-1770 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-1770.

January 11, 2007

MEMORANDUM ORDER

GARY LANCASTER, District Judge

On November 18, 2003, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On November 3, 2006, the magistrate judge issued a Report (Doc. 53) recommending that the District Court deny the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 44).

Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties, and no objections have been filed. After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, on this 11^th day of January, 2007, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment ( Doc. 44) is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza dated November 3, 2006 is hereby adopted as the opinion of the District Court.