From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamm v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin
Mar 15, 2022
3:21-cv-569 (W.D. Wis. Mar. 15, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-569

03-15-2022

PAUL HAMM, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(G)

Pursuant to the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters an order under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Sclwefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991).

On remand, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will proceed through the sequential disability evaluation process as appropriate and issue a new decision. If warranted, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Hamm v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin
Mar 15, 2022
3:21-cv-569 (W.D. Wis. Mar. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Hamm v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:PAUL HAMM, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin

Date published: Mar 15, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-569 (W.D. Wis. Mar. 15, 2022)