From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamm-Jordan v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Oct 31, 2024
No. 87976-COA (Nev. App. Oct. 31, 2024)

Opinion

87976-COA

10-31-2024

STRAHD VINCENT HAMM-JORDAN A/K/A STRAHD VINCENT HAMM, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Gibbons, C. J.

Strahd Vincent Hamm-Jordan appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered pursuant to a guilty plea, of residential burglary. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Egan K. Walker, Judge.

Hamm-Jordan argues that his sentence of 24-60 months in prison is excessive and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the U.S. and Nevada Constitutions. Regardless of its severity, "[a] sentence within the statutory limits is not 'cruel and unusual publishment unless the statute fixing punishment is unconstitutional or the sentence is so unreasonably disproportionate to the offense as to shock the conscience.'" Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996) (quoting Culverson v. State, 95 Nev. 433, 435, 596 P.2d 220, 221-22 (1979)); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion) (explaining the Eighth Amendment does not require strict proportionality between crime and sentence; it forbids only an extreme sentence that is grossly disproportionate to the crime).

The sentence imposed is within the parameters provided by the relevant statute, see NRS 205.060(2)(d), and Hamm-Jordan does not allege that the statute is unconstitutional. He argues that his sentence is grossly disproportional because it did not account for his mitigating circumstances: he had a limited and non-violent criminal history; he expressed remorse and accepted responsibility; and he had documented substance abuse issues. However, Hamm-Jordan argued these mitigating factors before the district court, and "[t]he sentencing judge has wide discretion in imposing a sentence." Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987). Having considered the sentence and the crime, we conclude that the sentence imposed is not grossly disproportional to the crime and does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Bulla, J. Westbrook, J.

Hon. Egan K. Walker, District Judge


Summaries of

Hamm-Jordan v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Oct 31, 2024
No. 87976-COA (Nev. App. Oct. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Hamm-Jordan v. State

Case Details

Full title:STRAHD VINCENT HAMM-JORDAN A/K/A STRAHD VINCENT HAMM, Appellant, v. THE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Nevada

Date published: Oct 31, 2024

Citations

No. 87976-COA (Nev. App. Oct. 31, 2024)