From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamlet v. State

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia at Bluefield Division
Jul 31, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-0057 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 31, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:06-0057.

July 31, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ORDER


By Standing Order entered on July 21, 2004, and filed in this case on January 25, 2005, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Standing Order directs Magistrate Judge VanDervort to submit proposed findings and recommendation concerning the disposition of this matter. Magistrate Judge VanDervort submitted his Proposed Findings and Recommendation on June 16, 2006, and proposed that this court: (1) confirm and accept the Magistrate Judge's findings as contained therein; (2) deny plaintiff's motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 2); (3) dismiss the case with prejudice; and (4) direct the Clerk to remove this matter from the court's active docket. (See Doc. No. 4 at 4.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the parties were allotted ten days, plus three mailing days, in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge VanDervort's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. After plaintiff changed his mailing address, the court allotted the parties ten additional days, and additional mailing days. Neither party filed any objections to the magistrate judge's proposed findings. The failure of any party to file objections within the appropriate time frame constitutes a waiver of such party's right to a de novo review by this court. Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989);Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge VanDervort, the court: (1) CONFIRMS and ACCEPTS the factual and legal analysis within the magistrate judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation; (2) DENIES plaintiff's motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 2); (3) DISMISSES this case with prejudice; and (4) DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this matter from the court's active docket and to forward a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Judgment Order to all counsel of record and to the petitioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hamlet v. State

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia at Bluefield Division
Jul 31, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-0057 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 31, 2006)
Case details for

Hamlet v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN LEON HAMLET, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia at Bluefield Division

Date published: Jul 31, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:06-0057 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 31, 2006)