From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1918
182 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Opinion

January, 1918.


The contractor did not perform his contract, and there should be deducted, therefore, from the balance of $2,377 unpaid, the sum of $1,000 on account of failure in the matter of hardware, waterproofing the cellar, cork floors, and for remedying defects in the doors; leaving a balance of $1,377, which should be applied on the liens of plaintiff and Odell in the order of priority. Findings in accordance herewith will be made, and all inconsistent findings are reversed. Judgment modified accordingly, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party in this court or the court below. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Mills, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Thomas.


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1918
182 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM R. HAMILTON and ALLAN M. HOLDER, Partners, etc., Respondents, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1918

Citations

182 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)