From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION
Dec 8, 2016
5:15-cv-00140-RLV (W.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 2016)

Opinion

5:15-cv-00140-RLV 5:12-cr-00002-RLV-DSC-1

12-08-2016

THOMAS PHELPS HAMILTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on consideration of Respondent's motion to stay the disposition of Petitioner's § 2255 Motion to Vacate. (Doc. No. 12: Motion to Stay).

In his pro se § 2255 Amended Motion to Vacate, Petitioner challenges, among other things, his designation as a career offender under § 4B1.2 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, and he relies on the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Johnson, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), in which the Court struck down the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), after concluding that it violated due process because it was unconstitutionally vague.

In the motion to stay, Respondent notes the Supreme Court is considering the case of Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544, to possibly resolve whether the Johnson Court's conclusion regarding the residual clause of the ACCA should apply to the residual clause of the career offender guideline, and if so, whether Johnson should apply retroactively on collateral review. The Court is also considering the issue of whether possession of a sawed-off shotgun is properly considered a crime of violence under the Guidelines.

Because resolution of the issues involved in the Beckles case may have a bearing on the disposition of the issues in Petitioner's case, the Court will grant Respondent's motion.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Respondent's motion to stay is GRANTED, (Doc. No. 12), and Respondent shall have 60-days from the date the Supreme Court renders its decision in Beckles v. Unites States to file a response to Petitioner's § 2255 Amended Motions to Vacate (Doc. Nos. 4, 7).

SO ORDERED. Signed: December 8, 2016

/s/_________

Richard L. Voorhees

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hamilton v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION
Dec 8, 2016
5:15-cv-00140-RLV (W.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Hamilton v. United States

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS PHELPS HAMILTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 8, 2016

Citations

5:15-cv-00140-RLV (W.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 2016)