From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
May 21, 2015
115 A.3d 1215 (Del. 2015)

Opinion

No. 49, 2015.

05-21-2015

James R. HAMILTON, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below–Appellee.


ORDER

LEO E. STRINE, JR., Chief Justice.

This 21st day of May 2015, the Court has carefully considered appellant's opening brief, the State's motion to affirm, and the record on appeal. We find it manifest that the Superior Court's judgment should be affirmed. The appellant completed his sentences in 2002 and thus had no standing to file a motion for postconviction relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

See Baltazar v. State, 2015 WL 257334, *3 (Del. Jan. 20, 2015).


Summaries of

Hamilton v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
May 21, 2015
115 A.3d 1215 (Del. 2015)
Case details for

Hamilton v. State

Case Details

Full title:James R. HAMILTON, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: May 21, 2015

Citations

115 A.3d 1215 (Del. 2015)