From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 1, 1991
578 So. 2d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2765.

May 1, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Richard D. Eade, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Jacqueline Saltiel, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm but remand to the trial court for the entry of a corrected order revoking probation. The corrected order should delete the three grounds which were not orally announced at the conclusion of the revocation hearing, as well as the alleged use of cocaine. We conclude that the finding of use of cocaine was not supported by competent evidence. The only grounds for the revocation should be failing to keep the appointment with the probation officer and failing to perform community service.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

ANSTEAD, DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hamilton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 1, 1991
578 So. 2d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Hamilton v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVE HAMILTON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 1, 1991

Citations

578 So. 2d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Hawthorne v. State

A written revocation order must conform to the oral pronouncement at the hearing. Hamilton v. State, 578…

Fierro v. State

We affirm but remand to the trial court for the entry of a corrected order revoking probation. Hamilton v.…