From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Shoop

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 28, 2018
CASE NO. 2:18-CV-1318 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:18-CV-1318

11-28-2018

JAMES E. HAMILTON, JR., Petitioner, v. TIM SHOOP, WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.


CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson OPINION AND ORDER

On November 6, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts recommending that this action be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as successive. (ECF No. 3.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as successive.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________11-28-2018

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Shoop

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 28, 2018
CASE NO. 2:18-CV-1318 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Shoop

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. HAMILTON, JR., Petitioner, v. TIM SHOOP, WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 28, 2018

Citations

CASE NO. 2:18-CV-1318 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2018)