From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Radnor Twp.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 29, 2024
Civil Action 19-cv-2599 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 19-cv-2599

02-29-2024

KARIMU HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. RADNOR TOWNSHIP, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

AND NOW, this 29th day of February, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Justin and Rachel Ridgeway's (the “Ridgeway Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 192), Plaintiff's response (ECF No. 208); Defendants Flanagan, Kochanski, Patterson, Racht, Lacey, Gluck, Geaves, and Pancoast's (collectively, the “Radnor Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 196), Plaintiff's response (ECF No. 208); and Defendant Bryn Mawr Fire Company's (the “Bryn Mawr Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 193), and Plaintiff's response (ECF No. 208), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Ridgeway Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 192) is GRANTED.

2. The Radnor Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 196) is GRANTED.

3. The Bryn Mawr Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 193) is GRANTED.

4. The Radnor Defendants' “Motion to Preclude the Testimony of Mickie W. McComb” (ECF No. 203) is DENIED AS MOOT.

5. JUDGMENT is ENTERED in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all claims in the Complaint. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Radnor Twp.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 29, 2024
Civil Action 19-cv-2599 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Radnor Twp.

Case Details

Full title:KARIMU HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. RADNOR TOWNSHIP, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 29, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 19-cv-2599 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2024)