From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Poenisch

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Nov 4, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02481-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Nov. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02481-WYD-MJW.

November 4, 2010


ORDER


The Notice of Removal [of] Action Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1446(b) (ECF No. 3) is STRICKEN from the record in this case. This filing is improper for numerous reasons under both federal law and the rules of this Court. Among the many problems with this filing is the fact that 28 U.S.C. § 1446 does not provide a procedure for removal of a state action by a plaintiff.

While Plaintiffs' filing is improper for numerous reasons, in the interest of judicial economy, I decline to address all of the problems and merely highlight a few in this Order.

Moreover, § 1446 provides that the Notice of Removal "shall be filed within thirty days after the receipt by the defendant, through service or otherwise, of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim for relief upon which such action or proceeding is based, . . . whichever period is shorter." 28 U.S.C. § 1446. Here, Plaintiffs are attempting to "remove" a state court action from 2001 into a separate federal action. This is clearly improper and will not be considered by the Court.

Dated: November 4, 2010


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Poenisch

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Nov 4, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02481-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Nov. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Poenisch

Case Details

Full title:TERRY D. HAMILTON, an individual; and CHEM-AWAY, INC., a Colorado…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Nov 4, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02481-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Nov. 4, 2010)