From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Nat'l Amusements, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 4, 2018
167 A.D.3d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

7806N Index 306467/13

12-04-2018

Khristina HAMILTON, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS, INC., Doing Business as Jamaica Multiplex Cinemas, Defendant–Appellant, Mattone Group Jamaica Company, LLC., Defendant.

Miranda Sambursky Slone Sklarin & Verveniotis LLP, Elmsford (John W. Manning of counsel), for appellant. Sacco & Fillas LLP, Astoria (Adam Nichols of counsel), for respondent.


Miranda Sambursky Slone Sklarin & Verveniotis LLP, Elmsford (John W. Manning of counsel), for appellant.

Sacco & Fillas LLP, Astoria (Adam Nichols of counsel), for respondent.

Sweeny, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Gische, Tom, Moulton, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered on or about August 10, 2017, which, in this action for personal injuries, granted plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 to vacate her default on defendant National Amusements, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion by accepting the law office failure of plaintiff's attorney as a reasonable excuse because that failure was isolated and unintentional and did not result in any prejudice to defendant (see Chevalier v. 368 E. 148th St. Assoc., LLC, 80 A.D.3d 411, 413–414, 914 N.Y.S.2d 130 [1st Dept. 2011] ; SS Constantine & Helen's Romanian Orthodox Church of Am. v. Z. Zindel, Inc., 44 A.D.3d 744, 843 N.Y.S.2d 414 [2d Dept. 2007] ). Furthermore, plaintiff's deposition testimony and the allegations contained in her bill of particulars sufficiently set forth a meritorious cause of action (see Mutual Mar. Off., Inc. v. Joy Constr. Corp., 39 A.D.3d 417, 419, 835 N.Y.S.2d 88 [1st Dept. 2007] ; Hunter v. Annexstein, 141 A.D.2d 449, 451, 529 N.Y.S.2d 785 [1st Dept. 1988] ).

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Nat'l Amusements, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 4, 2018
167 A.D.3d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Nat'l Amusements, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Khristina Hamilton, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. National Amusements, Inc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 4, 2018

Citations

167 A.D.3d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
167 A.D.3d 431
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 8269

Citing Cases

Solan v. Abdelqader

Moreover, vague and unsubstantiated allegations of law office failure do not constitute reasonable excuse for…

Kalaba v. Macy's, Inc.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in granting plaintiffs' motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 to…