From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Knipp

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 15, 2015
CV 14-8537-DSF(AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2015)

Opinion

          David Hamilton, Petitioner, Pro se, Ione, CA.

          William Knipp, Warden, Respondent: Taylor T Nguyen, Shawn McGahey Webb, CAAG - Office of the Attorney General, LEAD ATTORNEY, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DALE S. FISCHER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Knipp

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 15, 2015
CV 14-8537-DSF(AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Knipp

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HAMILTON, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM KNIPP, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 15, 2015

Citations

CV 14-8537-DSF(AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2015)