Summary
refusing to review a decision from the Court of Appeals after the petition was initially granted by this court
Summary of this case from Green v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Opinion
No. 88-168
Opinion delivered November 7, 1988
APPEAL ERROR — REVIEW ON CERTIORARI — WHERE PETITION WAS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED REVIEW WAS DENIED. — Where the supreme court was asked to review the decision of the court of appeals and had improvidently granted that review, review was denied.
On Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals to Review Its Affirmance of the Workers' Compensation Commission; review denied.
The McMath Law Firm, by: Eileen W. Harrison, for appellant.
Michael E. Ryburn, for appellees.
This case was before us last year. We remanded it to the court of appeals to decide the constitutionality of the time limitation placed on filing a workers' compensation disability claim when disability results from silicosis. Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co., 293 Ark. 499, 739 S.W.2d 161 (1987). The court of appeals held that the appellant's proof was not sufficient to show that the limitations period violates the equal protection and due process clauses of the U.S. Constitution. Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co., 25 Ark. App. 66, 752 S.W.2d 288 (1988).
Again we were asked to review the decision of the court of appeals, and we granted the petition. Upon further study, we have determined that review was improvidently granted.
Review denied.