From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Inch

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Sep 17, 2021
3:20cv5967-LC-HTC (N.D. Fla. Sep. 17, 2021)

Opinion

3:20cv5967-LC-HTC

09-17-2021

ALAN LYNSDALE HAMILTON, Petitioner, v. MARK INCH, Respondent.


ORDER

LACEY A. COLLIER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on June 23, 2021 (ECF No. 12). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No. objections have been filed

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. 7) is GRANTED. The petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely, without an evidentiary hearing.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Inch

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Sep 17, 2021
3:20cv5967-LC-HTC (N.D. Fla. Sep. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:ALAN LYNSDALE HAMILTON, Petitioner, v. MARK INCH, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Sep 17, 2021

Citations

3:20cv5967-LC-HTC (N.D. Fla. Sep. 17, 2021)