From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Graziano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 12, 2014
9:12-CV-0744 (TJM/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2014)

Opinion

9:12-CV-0744 (TJM/TWD)

12-12-2014

RALIK HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL GRAZIANO, Superintendent, Greene Correctional Facility, et al., Defendants.


THOMAS J. McAVOY,
Senior United States District Judge

DECISION & ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, was referred to the Hon. David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Peebles's Order and Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 39] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

II. DISCUSSION

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Order and Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Order and Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 39] for the reasons stated therein. Therefore, Defendants' motion to dismiss [dkt. # 38) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's amended complaint in this action is DISMISSED in its entirety as against both defendants, with prejudice, based upon his failure to prosecute and to appear for deposition in the action, as required by court order. The Clerk may close the file in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2014

/s/_________

Thomas J. McAvoy

Senior, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Graziano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 12, 2014
9:12-CV-0744 (TJM/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Graziano

Case Details

Full title:RALIK HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL GRAZIANO, Superintendent, Greene…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 12, 2014

Citations

9:12-CV-0744 (TJM/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2014)