Hamilton v. Foster

Full title: CHARLOTTE GRIFFIN HAMILTON, Individually and as parent and next friend of…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 3, 2005

NO. 1-04-1201-T-An (W.D. Tenn. Oct. 3, 2005)

Opinion

NO. 1-04-1201-T-An.

October 3, 2005

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING ORDER

S. ANDERSON, Judge

This matter came before the Court pursuant to Defendants' Motion to Amend Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order.

It appearing from the record that Defendants have shown good cause for amending the Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order and that Plaintiff does not oppose the amendment sought by Defendants' Motion, this Court finds that Defendants' Motion is well taken.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Amend Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order is GRANTED and that the Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order is amended as follows.

(b) EXPERT DISCLOSURE (Rule 26(a)(2)):

(ii) Defendants' Experts: November 18, 2005

(iii) Supplementation under Rule 26(e): December 5, 2005

(c) DEPOSITION OF EXPERTS: December 23, 2005.