noting that while other jurisdictions may recognize negligent infliction of emotional distress as an independent tort, Maryland does not
Summary of this case from Abdelkader v. Sears, Roebuck CompanySeptember Term, 1985
Decided May 2, 1986
Pet. Docket No. 665 — denied.
noting that while other jurisdictions may recognize negligent infliction of emotional distress as an independent tort, Maryland does not
Summary of this case from Abdelkader v. Sears, Roebuck CompanyFull title:HAMILTON v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO
Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland
Date published: May 2, 1986
Moreover, Maryland law does not recognize a cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional…