From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 16, 2021
No. 3535-21 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 16, 2021)

Opinion

3535-21

11-16-2021

Amanda Hamilton Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge

On October 28, 2021, the parties filed a proposed stipulated decision for the Court's consideration. Upon review of the record, however, it appears that petitioner may have paid the tax liability for the 2018 tax year prior to the issuance of the notice of deficiency. If so, the notice of deficiency issued to petitioner for the 2018 tax year is invalid and this Court lacks jurisdiction of this case. See Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527 (1985).

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that, on or before December 6, 2021, the parties shall show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid. We will hold the parties' proposed stipulated decision pending resolution of the jurisdictional issue in this case.


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 16, 2021
No. 3535-21 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Amanda Hamilton Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Nov 16, 2021

Citations

No. 3535-21 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 16, 2021)