From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Commissioner of Intenal Revenue Respondent

United States Tax Court
Jun 21, 2021
No. 11456-21S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 21, 2021)

Opinion

11456-21S

06-21-2021

Aisha Hamilton Petitioner v. Commissioner of Intenal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

It has come to the Court's attention that the petition fled in this case on April 7, 2021, was not properly executed in that it does not bear the original signature of petitioner or of a practitioner admitted to practice before this Court.

The foregoing considered, it is

ORDERED that petitioner shall, on or before August 2, 2021, file with the Court in paper form (not electronic) a Ratification of Petition bearing an original signature (not a photocopy), preferably in blue ink, in which petitioner states, if such be the case, that petitioner has read the petition fled on April 7, 2021, and ratify and affirms the fling of said document. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to attach to the copy of this Order served on petitioner a firm which ma be used by petitioner fr purposes of ratifying the petition.

RATIFICATION OF PETITION

__, have read the Ratification of Petition filed with the Court on __and do hereby ratify and affirm the filing of said document by affixing my signature hereto.


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Commissioner of Intenal Revenue Respondent

United States Tax Court
Jun 21, 2021
No. 11456-21S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Commissioner of Intenal Revenue Respondent

Case Details

Full title:Aisha Hamilton Petitioner v. Commissioner of Intenal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 21, 2021

Citations

No. 11456-21S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 21, 2021)