From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HAMILTON FOODS v. ATCHISON SANTA FE RY

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 31, 1949
173 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 11961.

February 11, 1949. Writ of Certiorari Denied May 31, 1949. See 69 S.Ct. 1158.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Charles C. Cavanah, Judge.

Albert H. Allen and Hyman Goldman, both of Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant Hamilton Foods.

Robert W. Walker and Louis M. Welsh, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Atchison, Topeka Santa Fe Ry. Co.

Before STEPHENS, HEALY, and ORR, Circuit Judges.


This case was tried to the judge without the aid of a jury and, upon a thorough review of the evidence, we find substantial evidence to support the findings and we cannot say that there is clear error in the case. Rule 52(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The judgment as to the appeal in Hamilton Foods, Inc., v. Atchison, Topeka Santa Fe Railway Company, and Jack Belyea etc., and the judgment as to the cross-appeal in Atchison, Topeka Santa Fe Railway Company v. Hamilton Foods, Inc., 83 F. Supp. 478, are affirmed.


Summaries of

HAMILTON FOODS v. ATCHISON SANTA FE RY

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 31, 1949
173 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1949)
Case details for

HAMILTON FOODS v. ATCHISON SANTA FE RY

Case Details

Full title:HAMILTON FOODS, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA SANTA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 31, 1949

Citations

173 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1949)