Summary
In Hamill v. Hamill, 38 Ill. App.2d 180, 186 N.E.2d 781, the court held that petitioner's loss of income under the G.I. Bill of Rights was not a sufficient showing of change of financial circumstances warranting modification of the decree.
Summary of this case from Graham v. GrahamOpinion
Gen. No. 62-O-8. (Abstract of Decision.)
December 12, 1962.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. RICHARD T. CARTER, Judge, presiding. Affirmed.
Alan J. Dixon, of Belleville, for appellant;
Fleming, Fiedler Hotto, of East St. Louis, for appellee.
Not to be published in full.